REVITALIZATION OF THE ROLE OF REPRESENTATIVES OF REPRESENTATIVES OF REGIONAL AUTHORITIES IN INDONESIA'S REGIONAL SYSTEMS (JURIDICAL CONDITIONS ARTICLE 22D NR 1945 Constitution, Court Decision NO.22 / PUU-X / 2012, Law NO.17 YEAR 2014 AND DECISION OF THE COURT NO.79 / PUU-XII / 2014)
By : PUTU ENDRA YUDA
Email : ENDRA74@GMAIL.COM
Faculties : Fakultas Hukum
Department : S1 Ilmu Hukum
Regional Representative Council (DPD) as a new state agency after the 1945 amendment was originally expected to be able to realize the presence of two rooms representation system (bicameral) aims to achieve good governance as well as the achievement of checks and balances between state institutions, especially in the legislature. As an embodiment of the people, DPD has very limited authority compared to the DPR in terms of the constitution and Act No. 17 of 2014. Implications of the Constitutional Court Decision No.79 / PUU-XII / 2014 only slightly changed in the strengthening of the authority of the DPD. The result of this research are expected as a reference, consideration, comparison, and improvements for future research in order to improve knowledge on strengthening the authority of the DPD in bicameralism Indonesia through constitutional amendment and amendment to the Act 17 of 2014. Normative juridical approach to the analysis of legislation and legal concepts is being used in this legal research. Result of this research is DPD RI actuating authority reinforcement through constitutional amendment consisting of some primary forces, formal amendement, judicial interpretation, and convention but each of those posses particular characteristic on the implementation and differ one another at their functional aspects achievement in order to equalize DPR RI authority under Indonesian bicameralism.
Keyword : DPD, Check and Balance, Bicameral System, Amendment